Mac OS X Leopard was a major feature upgrade over the previous system, Tiger, but don’t expect the same from Snow Leopard. Apple’s latest version of Mac OS X is not so much a whole new cat, but it’s definitely a sleeker and faster one.
Like Apple’s recent upgrade of the iPhone from 3G to the 3GS model, most of the changes in Snow Leopard are under the hood.
The whole operating system has been rebuilt from the ground up to boost speed, security and reliability. The difference is quite noticeable where it counts in desktop (Finder) operations and using any of Apple’s built-in programs that take advantage of Snow Leopard support for 64-bit processing and multi-core CPUs.
Snow Leopard’s new underlying technology, Grand Central Dispatch (GCD), provides better support for multi-core processors, while OpenCL puts spare graphics processing grunt to good use in other areas. Expect better performance from new programs as programmers take advantage of these new core technologies in future releases.
There are some noticeable feature additions in Snow Leopard, including an updated QuickTime player that lets you trim and share video, and the integration of Exposé features into the Dock. But it’s speed that Snow Leopard was built for, and it shows.
Our hands-on experience confirms that it does indeed feel a lot ‘snappier’, especially with a late model Intel Core 2 Duo (64-bit) processor on board. This is evident in Apple’s new 64-bit versions of programs such as the Finder, Mail, iCal, iChat and Safari.
Snow Leopard is pretty much a no-brainer for existing Leopard users (with an Intel CPU). At only $59 for single users ($99 for a five-user family pack) Apple’s latest version of Mac OS X is a bargain, compared with what Microsoft charges for new versions of Windows. If you’re upgrading from the previous OS, Tiger, Apple has a Mac Box Set that includes Snow Leopard, the latest iLife suite (iPhoto 09, iMovie 09, GarageBand 09, iWeb 09 and iDVD), plus the iWork suite (Pages 09, Numbers 09 and Keynote 09). It’s $349 for a single user or $479 for the family pack.
Check your specs first before ordering. Although Leopard supports the older G4 and G5 models, Snow Leopard requires an Intel processor. To check what your Mac uses, click the Apple menu and select ‘About this Mac’. If you have a PowerPC processor, then Leopard is unfortunately the end of the line.
Mac OS X Snow Leopard
Contact: www.apple.com/nz
Boy, I wish MS would get a life and look at their pricing for Windows 7 in light of this. I got so sick of the constantly escalating cost of running Windows that I have spent the past couple of years migrating my three machines to Ubuntu Linux and all open source software. Compared with the upgrade price for Leopard the upgrade cost of Win7 is plain and simple price gouging on a global scale.
Agree Snow Leopard is good but for one thing. It's improved power management system is killing the battery on laptops. For some reason Apple will not acknowledge the problem but if the users are to be believed the problem is significant - and yes I'm one of those suffering a murdered battery. Check out http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2139186 for a peek at the user comments. This could be enough to make me ditch Mac laptops.
Is this something Consumer might be interested in following up? I hope so.
I cannot agree with Maurice. I put Snow Leopard on a Macbook Pro and an iMac and it runs brilliantly. No issues whatsoever and all apps ran okay. Any needing updates were supported except our Canon scanner which is not supported in this release (Also noted on Apple's site). I switched to Mac 2 years ago and never looked back. Battery life is the same - about 4 - 5 hours. I reclaimed about 40GB of hard drive space.
There is a NZ forum on Mac - www.nzmac.com and no issues regarding battery life has been post there.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Posted by: |